<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the Bus, or Under the Bus?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ericspangler.net/on-the-bus-or-under-the-bus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ericspangler.net/on-the-bus-or-under-the-bus/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=on-the-bus-or-under-the-bus</link>
	<description>Eric Spangler&#039;s personal blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:10:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Espinosa</title>
		<link>http://ericspangler.net/on-the-bus-or-under-the-bus/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Espinosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ericspangler.net/?p=66#comment-22</guid>
		<description>There are some things I have thought of in response to the article &quot;On the Bus, or Under the Bus.&quot;  I have thought about a response that would point out, what I believe, are errors in the thought process behind the premises for the argument of atheism.  But I then, I ask myself whether pointing errors would truly convince anyone or plant any &quot;seeds&quot; for the future.  Would that just put our brothers and sisters on the defensive and create further distance and a longer &quot;stream&quot; of doubt in believing and having faith in God?  Would my discussion with an atheist just &quot;stir up&quot; anger to the surface and further resentment toward politically motivated modern day Christians; and a belief system that they may believe has hurt them and countless others in current and throughout the history of the Judeo Christian ideal/ethic?  Would they just take whatever comes out of my mouth as just a biased opinion or an attempt to &quot;convert&quot; them to the cause of someone&#039;s personal ajenda and self-righteous crusade?  Maybe to them I would seem to be suffering from a mental illness with &quot;religiousity&quot; as a symptom?  

Lately, I have been coming across conversations and sections of a couple of books I am reading related to my thoughts on this article.  There are a couple of things that seem to &quot;stick out&quot; in my mind the most in regards to the question that Eric Spangler poses: &quot;So, how would you respond?&quot; (in response to this article on atheism).  One of them is Galatians 5:22-23 about the fruits of the spirit of God--my most favorite line of scripture.  The line reads, in part: &quot;But the fruit if the spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control...&quot;  The other thing that &quot;sticks&quot; out for me is a line in the bible, unfortunately I cannot remember the scripture, which discusses being &quot;gentle&quot; in regards to others in situations like these.  I will also say, that as a long time skeptic and newly committed pursuer of the Christian way, I have experienced being on both sides of the argument of atheism throughout my life--and I have seen many ways that seem to only &quot;fester&quot; further and greater distance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some things I have thought of in response to the article &#8220;On the Bus, or Under the Bus.&#8221;  I have thought about a response that would point out, what I believe, are errors in the thought process behind the premises for the argument of atheism.  But I then, I ask myself whether pointing errors would truly convince anyone or plant any &#8220;seeds&#8221; for the future.  Would that just put our brothers and sisters on the defensive and create further distance and a longer &#8220;stream&#8221; of doubt in believing and having faith in God?  Would my discussion with an atheist just &#8220;stir up&#8221; anger to the surface and further resentment toward politically motivated modern day Christians; and a belief system that they may believe has hurt them and countless others in current and throughout the history of the Judeo Christian ideal/ethic?  Would they just take whatever comes out of my mouth as just a biased opinion or an attempt to &#8220;convert&#8221; them to the cause of someone&#8217;s personal ajenda and self-righteous crusade?  Maybe to them I would seem to be suffering from a mental illness with &#8220;religiousity&#8221; as a symptom?  </p>
<p>Lately, I have been coming across conversations and sections of a couple of books I am reading related to my thoughts on this article.  There are a couple of things that seem to &#8220;stick out&#8221; in my mind the most in regards to the question that Eric Spangler poses: &#8220;So, how would you respond?&#8221; (in response to this article on atheism).  One of them is Galatians 5:22-23 about the fruits of the spirit of God&#8211;my most favorite line of scripture.  The line reads, in part: &#8220;But the fruit if the spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control&#8230;&#8221;  The other thing that &#8220;sticks&#8221; out for me is a line in the bible, unfortunately I cannot remember the scripture, which discusses being &#8220;gentle&#8221; in regards to others in situations like these.  I will also say, that as a long time skeptic and newly committed pursuer of the Christian way, I have experienced being on both sides of the argument of atheism throughout my life&#8211;and I have seen many ways that seem to only &#8220;fester&#8221; further and greater distance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

